The diagram below shows a typical microservice architecture.
🔹Load Balancer: This distributes incoming traffic across multiple backend services.
🔹CDN
 (Content Delivery Network): CDN is a group of geographically 
distributed servers that hold static content for faster delivery. The 
clients look for content in CDN first, then progress to backend 
services.
🔹API Gateway: This handles incoming requests and 
routes them to the relevant services. It talks to the identity provider 
and service discovery.
🔹Identity Provider: This handles authentication and authorization for users.
🔹Service
 Registry & Discovery: Microservice registration and discovery 
happen in this component, and the API gateway looks for relevant 
services in this component to talk to.
🔹Management: This component is responsible for monitoring the services.
🔹Microservices:
 Microservices are designed and deployed in different domains. Each 
domain has its own database. The API gateway talks to the microservices 
via REST API or other protocols, and the microservices within the same 
domain talk to each other using RPC (Remote Procedure Call).
Benefits of microservices:
- They can be quickly designed, deployed, and horizontally scaled.
- Each domain can be independently maintained by a dedicated team.
- Business requirements can be customized in each domain and better supported, as a result.
 What are the drawbacks of the microservice architecture? 
Complexity: Managing multiple services, especially when they are high in number, can add significant complexity to the system.
Service
 Coordination: Ensuring that services work harmoniously can be 
challenging, especially when considering transactional operations 
spanning multiple services.
Network 
Latency: Since microservices communicate over a network, there can be a 
latency overhead compared to in-process calls in monolithic 
architectures.
Data Consistency: 
Ensuring data consistency across services, which might have their 
databases, can be complex, especially without distributed transactions.
Operational Overhead: Multiple services mean more deployments, monitoring endpoints, and more potential points of failure.
Distributed System Challenges: Issues like network partitioning and ensuring high availability come with distributed systems.
Versioning: As services evolve, ensuring backwards and forward compatibility becomes critical.
Security Concerns: More exposure points can lead to more potential security vulnerabilities.
Initial Development Overhead: Microservices setup is initially time-intensive due to foundational needs. 
I’ve been working with distributed systems, and network latency and versioning issues definitely resonate with me. Your explanation of the API gateway and service registry makes it easier to visualize the flow. Curious—how do you usually approach microservice scaling in high-traffic scenarios? Can’t wait for your follow-up insights.
ReplyDelete